US District Court for the District of South Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Doran v. Elms of Charleston Inc, The et al
as 2:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
Mary Doran
Defendant:
Elms of Charleston Inc, The and Community Management Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harrison v. Kennedy et al
as 3:2018cv00057
Plaintiff:
Eugene P Harrison
Defendant:
Jennifer C Kennedy and Sumter Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childress v. Roberts et al
as 7:2017cv02529
Plaintiff:
Little Tom Childress, Jr
Defendant:
Rebecca Roberts, Babbie M Jaco and Boyd Management LTD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Blackstock v. Hartsville YMCA
as 4:2017cv01925
Plaintiff:
Sepia Vonnetta Blackstock
Defendant:
Hartsville YMCA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. City of Clinton et al
as 6:2017cv01858
Plaintiff:
Tabetha Moody
Defendant:
City of Clinton , Related Clinton Manor LLC and Related Management Company LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Awkard v. Rammelsburg et al
as 4:2017cv01542
Plaintiff:
Veronica Awkard
Defendant:
Sharon Rammelsburg, Saundra Rammelsburg, Mary Stitcher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Key v. Ansonborough House et al
as 2:2017cv00636
Plaintiff:
Willie A Key
Defendant:
Ansonborough House and Donna Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cunningham v. Housing Management Resources, Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv03276
Plaintiff:
Jessica R. Cunningham
Defendant:
Housing Management Resources, Inc. and Pardue-Lancaster, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Walker v. South Carolina Regional Housing Development Corporation No 1 et al
as 8:2016cv03070
Plaintiff:
Alquetta Walker
Defendant:
South Carolina Regional Housing Development Corporation No 1 and Brian Griswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jackson v. City of Aiken Housing Authority et al
as 1:2016cv02831
Plaintiff:
Kenisha Jackson
Defendant:
City of Aiken Housing Authority, Reginal Barner and Debra Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
