US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 21,035
Thompson v. Spoone et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Tavarus Thompson
Defendant:
Sergeant Spoone, 1st Sergeant Franzen and Major Gregory Mcrae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooke v. Department Of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
George A. Cooke
Defendant:
Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Batts v. USA
as 4:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Levell Batts, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Manuel v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00380
Petitioner:
Gaitan Manuel
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Maynard v. Pamunkey Regional Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Maynard
Defendant:
Pamunkey Regional Jail, Willett, Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Bowles
as 1:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
James L. Brown
Respondent:
K. Bowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Stoy et al
as 1:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks
Defendant:
Stoy, Williams, Officer Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monzon v. Rogers et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
L Rogers, Shenica Royster, Erick Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Charles v. Loudoun Times-Mirror et al
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Charles
Defendant:
Loudoun Times-Mirror, Ogden Newspapers and Evan Goodenow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Sol D. Burke
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
