US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 181
James v. Abraham et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Myron Sylveste James
Defendant:
Lt. W/F Abraham, Doctor PA Wood, Doctor PA Burishman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Damron v. FCI Hazelton Staff
as 5:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Damron
Defendant:
FCI Hazelton Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Black v. Rey et al
as 5:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Black
Defendant:
Warden Rey, Unknown Doctor and Health Service Staff and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
James v. Townsent et al
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Myron Sylveste James
Defendant:
J Townsent, T Solmon Murice, J F Dimes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ortiz v. Hicks
as 5:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Nathanael R. Ortiz
Defendant:
Lieutenant Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vonehl v. Lovett et al
as 5:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Adam Michael Vonehl
Defendant:
S. Lovett, Office of Inspector General and Federal Bureau of Prisons Central Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Turner v. SFF Hazelton
as 3:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
Nekia Turner
Respondent:
SFF Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Allen v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
David M. Allen
Defendant:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Waters v. Brown et al
as 5:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Waters and Karlton Cherry
Defendant:
Warden, Acting Warden S. Brown, J. McCalloum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Nunley
as 3:2022cv00184
Petitioner:
Eiko Jones
Respondent:
Acting Warden Nunley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
