US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Brown et al v. Superior Pocahontas, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00572
Plaintiff:
Bulldog Excavating, LLC and Aaron D. Brown
Defendant:
Superior Pocahontas, LLC, Marion Hensley and Mark Hatcher
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hafco Foundry and Machine Company, Incorporated v. GMS Mine Repair and Maintenance, Inc.
as 1:2015cv16143
Plaintiff:
Hafco Foundry and Machine Company, Incorporated
Defendant:
GMS Mine Repair and Maintenance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Racing Corporation of West Virginia
as 2:2015cv02675
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Racing Corporation of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Justice Family Group, LLC
as 5:2014cv25275
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Justice Family Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Darco International, Inc. v. Medical Specialties, Inc.
as 3:2013cv28672
Plaintiff:
Darco International, Inc.
Defendant:
Medical Specialties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Eclipse IP, LLC v. Nordstrom, Inc.
as 2:2012cv06615
Plaintiff:
Eclipse IP, LLC
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv05403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Calwell v Energizer Personal Care, LLC, et al
as 3:2012cv03635
Plaintiff:
Stuart Calwell
Defendant:
Energizer Personal Care, LLC and Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Peterson v. Invent-Tech et al
as 2:2011cv00867
Plaintiff:
Brent Alan Peterson
Defendant:
Invent Tech and Sam Artioli
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
A. L. Lee Corporation v. Roscioli et al
as 5:2011cv00345
Plaintiff:
A. L. Lee Corporation
Defendant:
Edward V. Roscioli and Willem F. Van Basten
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
