US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,758
Rosser-Burch v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Teyon Rosser-Burch
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Peterson v. Ward
as 3:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Quinton Peterson
Respondent:
Josh Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fleitas v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Carlos Fleitas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
Houston P. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hernandez v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00091
Petitioner:
Marco Hernandez
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bernazal v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Miguel Bernazal
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Juran James Brown
Defendant:
Warden W. Holzapfel
Petitioner:
Juvan James Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ramirez-Torres v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
Patricio Ramirez-Torres
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Davis v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Richard Odell Davis, III
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dickens v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Terence Dickens
Respondent:
Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
