West Virginia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 130
Eclipse IP, LLC v. Nordstrom, Inc.
as 2:2012cv06615
Plaintiff:
Eclipse IP, LLC
Defendant:
Nordstrom, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Eclipse IP, LLC v. Lucy Activewear, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00147
Plaintiff:
Eclipse IP, LLC
Defendant:
Lucy Activewear, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Eclipse IP, LLC v. Cornerstone Brands, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
Eclipse IP, LLC
Defendant:
Cornerstone Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv05403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Calwell v Energizer Personal Care, LLC, et al
as 3:2012cv03635
Plaintiff:
Stuart Calwell
Defendant:
Energizer Personal Care, LLC and Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Pfizer, Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00106
Plaintiff:
Pfizer, Inc. , Wyeth LLC , Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mylan Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Eclipse IP, LLC v. JP Boden USA LLC
as 5:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Eclipse IP, LLC
Defendant:
JP Boden USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Shire LLC et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00201
Plaintiff:
Shire LLC , Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Shire Development Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mylan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Peterson v. Invent-Tech et al
as 2:2011cv00867
Plaintiff:
Brent Alan Peterson
Defendant:
Invent Tech and Sam Artioli
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
PMG, Inc. v. Vestil Manufacturing Corp. et al
as 5:2011cv00089
Plaintiff:
PMG, Inc.
Defendant:
Vestil Manufacturing Corp., Barco Products Company, Galeton and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
