US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,523
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ryall v. Normandy Village Apts. Inc.
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Michael John Ryall, Sr.
Defendant:
Normandy Village Apts. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Dillard's Inc., et al.
as 3:2024cv00510
Defendant:
Dillard's Inc. and Higbee Louisiana, LLC
Plaintiff:
Venessa Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Wright v. Pelletier
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Jerin B. Wright
Defendant:
Charles Pelletier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrington v. Food and Drug Administration
as 3:2024cv00497
Defendant:
Food and Drug Administration
Plaintiff:
Kohl Harrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harrington v. Food and Drug Administration
as 3:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Kohl Harrington
Defendant:
Food and Drug Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. Webre, et al
as 3:2024cv00490
Defendant:
Bobby Webre and James Lightfoot
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Derbes v. State of Louisiana
as 3:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Matthew Derbes
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Derbes v. The Attorney General for the State of Louisiana, Department of Justice
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Matthew Derbes
Defendant:
The Attorney General for the State of Louisiana, Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
