Northern District of Mississippi Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 1,139
O'Neal v. Banks
as 1:2017cv00022
Petitioner: Joe Wesley O'Neal
Respondent: Jacquelyn Banks
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Britton v. Turner
as 3:2017cv00011
Petitioner: Meika DeSean Britton
Respondent: Marshall Turner
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burrell v. Central Mississippi Correctional, et al
as 3:2017cv00009
Petitioner: Tyrone Burrell
Respondent: Jim Hood , Central Mississippi Correctional
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Lee et al
as 4:2017cv00004
Petitioner: Edmund Brown, Jr.
Respondent: Lee, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Fisher et al
as 1:2016cv00236
Petitioner: Joe Nathan Harris
Respondent: Marshall Fisher, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flippo v. Lee County Circuit Court et al
as 1:2016cv00230
Petitioner: Nathan Flippo
Respondent: Lee County Circuit Court , Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
German v. Outlaw et al
as 3:2016cv00288
Petitioner: Cherelle German
Respondent: Timothy Outlaw, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strong v. United States
as 1:2016cv00235
Petitioner: Anthony Strong
Respondent: United States
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hughes v. Shults
as 3:2016cv00265
Petitioner: Kerrick Deshaun Hughes
Respondent: L. Shults
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Griffin v. Fisher et al
as 4:2016cv00227
Petitioner: Jamie Griffin
Respondent: Marshall Fisher, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?