US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Laury-McArthur v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Brandon DePaul Laury-McArthur
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of the General Counsel and General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sibley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2020cv00225
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Arkia Tremonica Sibley
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Robertson v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00295
Plaintiff:
Ronald C. Robertson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv00127
Plaintiff:
Albert Earl Jackson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Griffith v. Astrue et al
as 3:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
Walter Excell Griffith, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Washington v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00504
Plaintiff:
Janice Washington
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Matthews v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
Delores Matthews
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roberson v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00577
Plaintiff:
Gregory Earl Roberson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rizzuto v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2011cv00091
Plaintiff:
David M. Rizzuto
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brunelle v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv00032
Plaintiff:
Keith W. Brunelle
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
