US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Cases 11 - 20 of 45,145
Smith v. City of McComb Police Department
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Markez Smith
Defendant:
City of McComb Police Department
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye v. Cain et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Dye
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Brand Huffman, J. Canale and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Desmond Shields and Jasmine Shields
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bates v. USA
as 1:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Decorie Deshun Bates
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Carrier Corporation v. Character One LLC
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Carrier Corporation
Defendant:
Character One LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Thompson v. E-7 Logistics, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Zavion C. Thompson
Defendant:
E-7 Logistics, LLC, Vladimir Ilic, Cody Scott Graska and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Stewart v. The Kroger Company et al
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Bradley Stewart
Defendant:
The Kroger Company and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Reed v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Tommie James Reed, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Necaise v. Bay St. Louis-Waveland School District
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Amy Necaise
Defendant:
Bay St. Louis-Waveland School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
