Mississippi Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 12,433
Nelson v. USA
as 3:2020cv00334
Petitioner: Kathleen Nelson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
May v. Mississippi Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2020cv00167
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Phillip Darryl May
Defendant: Mississippi Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duncan v. County of Forrest et al
as 2:2020cv00088
Defendant: County of Forrest, City of Hattiesburg, State of Mississippi and others
Plaintiff: Alex-Wayne Duncan
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Payton v. Davis
as 1:2020cv00098
Respondent: Josh Davis
Petitioner: Glen Payton
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Bridges et al
as 3:2020cv00328
Defendant: Officer Unknown Breedlode, Officer Unknown Chaplain, Sgt. Unknown Bridges
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Carvis Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Arenas v. John Doe
as 3:2020cv00329
Defendant: John Doe
Plaintiff: Jose Ricardo Silva Arenas
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00326
Plaintiff: Joseph H. Watson, Jr.
Defendant: CMCF, Department of Corrections, Officer Frein and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Ayelotan v. USA
as 1:2020cv00162
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Oladimeji Seun Ayelotan
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
Thompson v. Davis
as 1:2020cv00084
Respondent: Joshua Davis
Petitioner: Christopher Thompson
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaCruz v. Rankin County
as 3:2020cv00320
Plaintiff: Matthew De LaCruz
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Rankin County
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?