Mississippi Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 71 - 80 of 12,439
Baker v. Sheriff et al
as 3:2020cv00238
Plaintiff: Richard Baker
Defendant: Sheriff Deputy Terry Gann, Sheriff Jacob Sheriff
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Arrington
as 1:2020cv00134
Defendant: Joseph Arrington
Plaintiff: Peter Henderson
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hillie v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv00236
Plaintiff: Gregory Marque Hillie
Defendant: Lynn Fitch, Sheriff Kelvin Williams, Ronald King
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. King et al
as 3:2020cv00235
Plaintiff: Timothy Allen McCoy
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Defendant: Ronald King
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Love v. Dyer et al
as 3:2020cv00237
Defendant: Gains S. Dyer, Lynn Fitch, Ronald King
Plaintiff: William Wade Love
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. USA
as 1:2020cv00133
Petitioner: Mack Allen Bradley
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
Perilloux v. Doe
as 3:2020cv00234
Defendant: Warden John Doe
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Hulen Perilloux
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cannady v. Woodall
as 1:2020cv00130
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Cornelius Cannady, Sr.
Defendant: R. Woodall
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Gandy v. Turner et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Plaintiff: Kenneth D. Gandy
Defendant: Tom S. Lee, David Turner, Michael C. Moore
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. King
as 3:2020cv00229
Defendant: Ronald King
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Petitioner: Joseph Bennett
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?