Mississippi Labor Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,908
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Gholar et al
as 2:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Laqunta Gholar, Blake Williams, Cory Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Truitt v. PNK Vicksburg, LLC
as 3:2023cv03103
Plaintiff:
Terence Truitt
Defendant:
PNK Vicksburg, LLC doing business as Ameristar Casino Hotel Vicksburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ogburn v. PHC-Cleveland, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Shawanda Ogburn
Defendant:
PHC-Cleveland, LLC doing business as Bolivar Medical Center and Unum Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hatten v. Laurel School District
as 2:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Avery Hatten
Defendant:
Laurel School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lucas v. Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville, LLC
as 4:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Maryann Lucas
Defendant:
Allegiance Specialty Hospital of Greenville, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Singh v. Bajwa et al
as 4:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Preet Jayot Singh
Defendant:
Joginder Singh Bajwa, JB Food Mart LLC, Manjit Kaur Bajwa and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williamson v. Masonite Corporation
as 2:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jucinda Williamson
Defendant:
Masonite Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lane v. CCFI Companies, LLC
as 3:2023cv02997
Plaintiff:
Debra Lane
Defendant:
CCFI Companies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Beech v. ABB Inc.
as 3:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Chad Beech
Defendant:
ABB Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Langston v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02976
Plaintiff:
Tameka Langston
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
