US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Arnold v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv03605
Plaintiff:
Courtney Arnold
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hill v. Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
as 4:2023cv01147
Plaintiff:
Alexis Hill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Marshall v. Kijakazi
as 6:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Ronica Marshall
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Gaytan v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2021cv00113
Petitioner:
Gabriel Gaytan, Sr
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Hogquist v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Nelson Hogquist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Montgomery v. US Attorney Guam et al
as 4:2020cv03913
Plaintiff:
Bert D Montgomery
Defendant:
Bank of Saipan and US Attorney Guam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Thomas v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv01771
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Marie Thomas
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill and Social Security Administration (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Brasseur v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv01420
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Brasseur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Paxson v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv00632
Plaintiff:
Linda M. Paxson
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Woolwine v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2016cv03727
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Aimee Woolwine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
