US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 45
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. Tree Town Holdings, Ltd. et al
as 4:2008cv01053
Intervenor Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
Gandy Marketing & Trucking, Inc., Gandy Nursery, Inc., Gandy Real Estate & Nursery Inventory, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Tree Town Holdings, Ltd. and Austin Bank, Texas N.A.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bielersee Trading, LLC et al v. United States of America et al
as 7:2008cv00101
Plaintiff:
Bielersee Trading, LLC and Alber Fund, LLC
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Treasury, IRS, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cold Stone Creamery v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2008cv00655
Plaintiff:
Cold Stone Creamery
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bielersee Trading, LLC et al v. United States Attorney Southern District of Texas et al
as 7:2008cv00059
Petitioner:
Bielersee Trading, LLC and Alber Fund, LLC
Defendant:
United States Attorney Southern District of Texas, Department of Treasury, IRS, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Filed in error
as 7:2007cv00189
Plaintiff:
Filed in error
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Galba Trading, LLC vs USA
as 7:2007mc00043
Plaintiff:
Galba Trading, LLC
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Allen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 4:2007cv02228
Petitioner:
Denvil W Allen, Jr and Donna R Allen
Respondent:
Commissioner of Internal Revenues Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Filed in error
as 4:2007cv01544
Plaintiff:
Filed in error
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
