US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 10,975
Drakos v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv00534
Petitioner:
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andrus v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00440
Petitioner:
Charles Ray Andrus
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00437
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00450
Petitioner:
Danny J. Sims
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soliz v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00410
Petitioner:
Jesus Soliz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randall v. 79th District Court Jim Wells County
as 7:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Joseph Juventino Randall
Defendant:
79th District Court Jim Wells County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Obryant v. Hinojosa
as 4:2024cv00365
Petitioner:
Hightower O'Bryant and Hightower Obryant
Respondent:
Rene Hinojosa and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randall v. 79th District Court Jim Wells County
as 2:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Joseph Juventino Randall
Defendant:
79th District Court Jim Wells County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Black v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00333
Petitioner:
J.B. Black
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Alfredo Elias Gomez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
