US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 27,264
Acosta, Jr. v. Ortiz et al
as 4:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Raul Anthony Acosta, Jr.
Defendant:
Detention Officer Ortiz, Detention Officer Salazar, Sgt. Bigham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01423
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Desouze v. Dr. Hemant Patel
as 4:2024cv01400
Plaintiff:
Neville Ambrose Desouze
Defendant:
Dr. Hemant Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mixon v. Cross et al
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Danny Mixon
Defendant:
Ms. Cross, Mr. Osobrook and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Harris County Sheriff's Office Jail
as 4:2024cv01408
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Stewart
Defendant:
Harris County Sheriff's Office Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Jerald K. Graber et al
as 4:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Carl W. Robertson
Defendant:
Jerald K. Graber, Terry Gaiser and Hazel B. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burleson v. Burleson et al
as 4:2024cv01376
Plaintiff:
LaDorthy Burleson
Defendant:
Artis Ray Burleson and Carrie Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeBorde v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01371
Petitioner:
Christopher DeBorde
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Boyce v. B. Smith et al
as 4:2024cv01372
Plaintiff:
Clifford Boyce
Defendant:
B. Smith, T. Mitchell and A. Wasson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Mayorkas
as 4:2024cv01389
Petitioner:
Rodney Lee Thompson
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
