US District Court for the Western District of Texas Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,201
Patent Armory Inc. v. Paypal Inc.
as 6:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
Paypal Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory Inc. v. Texas Taco Cabana, L.P.
as 6:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
Texas Taco Cabana, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory Inc. v. Chuy's Opco, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
Chuy's Opco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
MiBev Creations, LLC v. A.O. Smith Water Treatment (North America), Inc.
as 1:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
MiBev Creations, LLC
Defendant:
A.O. Smith Water Treatment (North America), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory Inc. v. Dell Technologies Inc.
as 6:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
Dell Technologies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory Inc. v. BBDI LLC
as 6:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
BBDI LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory, Inc. v. Adidas America Inc.
as 6:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory, Inc.
Defendant:
Adidas America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory, Inc. v. American Express Company
as 6:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory, Inc.
Defendant:
American Express Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Mullen Industries LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Mullen Industries LLC
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Wyoming Technology Licensing, LLC v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Wyoming Technology Licensing, LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
