Texas Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 38,847
Ramos v. Southworth PC Shawn Southworth Attorney
as 4:2024cv00850
Defendant:
Southworth PC Shawn Southworth Attorney
Plaintiff:
Marion Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02280
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ellis v. Aaon Coil Products, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00725
Defendant:
Aaon Coil Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shamia Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00816
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Scott v. Lieutenant Wasko #4557 et al
as 1:2024cv01045
Defendant:
Victoria Danene Brown, Hays County Sheriff Gary Cutler, Judicial Officer Joe R. Pool and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jerome Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cleghorn v. Leonard et al
as 6:2024cv00460
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Jesse Harker and Stephen Leonard
Plaintiff:
Angela Cleghorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salganik v. City of Waco et al
as 6:2024cv00457
Defendant:
Jeremy Angel, Chief Sheryl D. Victorian, City of Waco and others
Plaintiff:
Kallan Salganik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03310
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Knox-Morris v. CVS Health
as 4:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Nicole Knox-Morris
Defendant:
CVS Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
