Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 41,816
Tansimore-El v. Hadaway et al
as 1:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
James L Tansimore-El
Respondent:
Shane Hadaway, Mike Fouts, Chris Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00891
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. The State of Texas
as 7:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Jason Derrell Cooper
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01325
Petitioner:
Lester Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cabello v. Hijar
as 3:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Archie Cabello
Respondent:
Sandra Hijar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Farmer v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00139
Petitioner:
Charles M Farmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevenson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Stevenson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alford v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01380
Petitioner:
Weylin W. Alford
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cantu Vela v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Horacio Cantu Vela
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noonan v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Noonan
Respondent:
Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice and Richard Wiles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
