U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,103
Tracy Halsell v. Barack Obama
as 22-4023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACY D. HALSELL
Defendant / Appellee:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
Donald Reynolds, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 22-6052
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD RAY REYNOLDS, JR., aka Donald Ray Reynolds-Bey
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF TENNESSEE, U.S. SUPREME COURT and others
Michael Williamson v. Rachael Wheeler, et al
as 22-4017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WILLIAMSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RACHAEL WHEELER and ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH
Estephen Castellon v. Greg Hinkle, et al
as 22-4011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTEPHEN CASTELLON
Defendant / Appellee:
GREG HINKLE and JOHN OR JANE DOE
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
Devin McGuire v. Loudon County, TN, et al
as 22-6049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVIN D. MCGUIRE
Defendant:
LOUDON COUNTY, TN
Defendant / Appellee:
JAILER BROCKWELL, JAILER WARD, JHON KEENER, Jailer and others
Donald Kissner v. Joseph Orr, et al
as 22-2076
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD LEE KISSNER
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER JOSEPH MICHAEL ORR, OFFICER LUKE ROGERS, PROSECUTOR CHRIS BROWN and others
Robert Annabel, II v. Jackson County, MI Sheriff Department, et al
as 22-2071
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant / Appellee:
JACKSON COUNTY, MI SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, ADVANCED HEALTH CARE, GARY SCHUTTE, Sheriff and others
Michael Busby, Jr. v. Nathaniel Carpenter
as 22-2065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RANDOLPH BUSBY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHANIEL CARPENTER, Correctional Officer, MDOC
Jeremy Kerr v. Robert Pollex, et al
as 22-3993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY LYNN KERR
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT POLLEX, ALAN R. MAYBERRY, MATTHEW REGER and others
Vaughn Harris v. City of Nashville, TN, et al
as 22-6031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VAUGHN HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NASHVILLE, TN, SHERIFF DARON HALL, STAFF OF SHERIFF DARON HALL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
