Sixth Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 562
King v. Commissioner of Social Security

as 1:2019cv01062
Defendant:
Social Security and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Michael R King and Michael R. King
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security

as 1:2019cv01039
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Mary Elizabeth Jackson
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Elliott v. Commissioner of Social Secuity

as 2:2019cv13507
Plaintiff:
Kelly A Elliott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Morandy v. Commissioner of Social Secuity

as 2:2019cv13464
Plaintiff:
Gretchen Mary Morandy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Burgess v. Social Security

as 2:2019cv13243
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kevin S Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Purley-Ball v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv02488
Plaintiff:
Marcia Purley-Ball
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Dano v. Commissioner of Social Secuity
as 2:2019cv13061
Plaintiff:
Ashley Elizabeth Dano
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Walden v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

as 1:2019cv00288
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dayne Walden
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Petters v. Social Security
as 2:2019cv12978
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Petters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Mehay v. Commissioner of Social Secuity

as 2:2019cv12991
Plaintiff:
Joshua Louis Mehay
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.