Sixth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,045
Freed v. International City/County Management Association et al
as 4:2023cv12365
Plaintiff:
James R. Freed
Defendant:
International City/County Management Association, Jessica Cowles, Victor Cardenas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Dey v. Byrd et al
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Swati Dey
Defendant:
John C. Byrd and Sakthivel Sadayappan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Gray v. Winton Woods City Schools, et al
as 1:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Kathryn gray
Defendant:
Winton Woods City Schools, Anthony smith, Steven denny and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Cedeno v. Upchurch et al
as 3:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Melvin Cedeno
Defendant:
Ryan Upchurch and Fictitious Persons 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Bryan Reo v. Martin Lindstedt
as 23-3676
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN ANTHONY REO
Cross Appellant:
MARTIN LINDSTEDT
Robertson et al v. Upchurch
as 3:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
David Robertson and Daniel Rodni
Defendant:
Ryan Upchurch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Bryan Reo v. Martin Lindstedt
as 23-3614
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN ANTHONY REO
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN LINDSTEDT
Pendleton v. Beasley et al
as 3:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Pendleton
Defendant:
Marquica Beasley and B-Elite Real Estate Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Assault, Libel & Slander
Alam et al v. Perry et al
as 4:2023cv11640
Plaintiff:
MD Rabbi Alam, Shere Alam Rasu and MD Rajvi Alam
Defendant:
Scott Gordon Perry, Barry Moore, Timothy Floyd Burchett and others
Marshall v. Marshall et al
as 3:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Lauren Marshall
Defendant:
Jane Marshall and Gilbert Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
