Sixth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 91 - 100 of 14,651
Collum v. USA
as 5:2024cv00323
Petitioner: Terry M. Collum
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sheridan v. USA
as 5:2024cv00327
Petitioner: Brandon L. Sheridan
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mercado-Lozano v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00167
Petitioner: Ricardo Mercado-Lozano and Heriberto Diaz-Lozano
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Newman v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00162
Petitioner: Casey Richard Newman
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Luster v. USA
as 5:2024cv00313
Petitioner: Vernon M. Luster
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Windham v. USA
as 5:2024cv00320
Petitioner: Seth Windham
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Meehan v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02110
Petitioner: Shaun Meehan
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McGowan v. USA
as 2:2024cv10391
Petitioner: Patrick McGowan
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ford v. USA
as 1:2024cv00069
Petitioner: Michael Wayne Ford
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DeCarlos Titington v. USA
as 24-5136
Petitioner: DECARLOS TITINGTON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?