Sixth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,313
Hinson v. DTE Electric Company
as 2:2023cv13032
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Hinson
Defendant:
DTE Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rayford v. Mobile Phlebotomy of Central Michigan LLC et al
as 1:2023cv13012
Defendant:
Mobile Phlebotomy of Central Michigan LLC, MPCM Services and Amanda Breasbois
Plaintiff:
Tonzania Rayford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Field v. 351 North Avon, Inc. et al.
as 1:2023cv02302
Plaintiff:
Cailynn Field
Defendant:
351 North Avon, Inc., George Sideris, Anastassios Alexandris and others
McClendon v. Martinrea Jonesville LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01246
Plaintiff:
Derrick McClendon
Defendant:
Martinrea Jonesville LLC and Martinrea International US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McGill et al v. Xponential Fitness LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03909
Plaintiff:
Shannon McGill, Gina Oliveira, Justin Curry and others
Defendant:
Xponential Fitness LLC, XPOF Assetco, LLC, AKT Franchise, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Logunova v. Rapid Title Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00775
Plaintiff:
Galina Logunova
Defendant:
Rapid Title Inc and Margarita Moskin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Adams v. Inspired Concepts LLC
as 1:2023cv12968
Plaintiff:
Katelyn Adams
Defendant:
Inspired Concepts LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garner v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation
as 1:2023cv02258
Plaintiff:
Deborah Garner
Defendant:
Cleveland Clinic Foundation doing business as Cleveland Clinic
Bennink v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC
as 1:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
LOREN BENNINK
Defendant:
Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Setliff v. Charter Manufacturing Company, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02255
Plaintiff:
Timothy Setliff
Defendant:
Charter Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
