US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,130
Guzman v. USA
as 6:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Marco Guzman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Paris v. Mosley
as 6:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Lamar Paris
Respondent:
Jamie Mosley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Jonathan Martinez
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daniels v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Kenneth Daniels
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coffman v. Roby
as 6:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Timothy S. Coffman
Respondent:
Amy Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Triana-Ceballos v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Triana-Ceballos
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Crandall James
Respondent:
Warden, USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
CRAIG QUINZEL JONES and KEITH DOUGHERTY
Respondent:
FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hambrick v. Robey et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Brandon Hambrick, Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Robey and Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krieg v. Warden, USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
Eric Krieg
Respondent:
Warden, USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
