Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 5,197
Scott v. Logan County et al
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Logan County, Michael Trimmer, Todd Burchett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Bannon v. K.C.P.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00430
Defendant:
Ron Jackson and K.C.P.C.
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lee O'Bannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medley v. Davis
as 5:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Ian Michael Medley
Defendant:
P. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silverburg v. Moss et al
as 5:2024cv00191
Defendant:
Chesley Woodrum, Harvey Cloyd, Adam T Moss and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Silverburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sneed v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00421
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dow v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00411
Defendant:
Sgt. Slogan, CO Deltero, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Tea Dow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 4:2024cv00071
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Mike Lewis and Joshua Reno
Plaintiff:
Duwayne Michael Moore, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Dillion et al
as 4:2024cv00069
Defendant:
David Gary, Jason Woosley, Brian Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Reno
as 4:2024cv00070
Defendant:
Joshua Reno
Plaintiff:
Duwayne Moore, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Jordan et al
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Alger C. Ferguson and Clyde Litton
Defendant:
Scott Jordan and Anna Valentine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.