Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 5,197
Okum et al v. County of Christian, KY et al
as 5:2024cv00119
Defendant:
Gregory Corteze, Joshua Stallons, County of Christian, KY and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Okum and Jacquelyn B. Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Chaney et al
as 3:2024cv00386
Defendant:
Ofc. Alex W. Thomas, Ofc. Derron Scales and Sgt. Bobbie D. Chaney
Plaintiff:
Ryan David Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurman v. Crews et al
as 4:2024cv00063
Defendant:
Brianna Capel, Stacy Gibson, Cookie Crews and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Thurman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jonathan M. Rankins
Defendant:
Boyer and P. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Whight et al
as 0:2024cv00064
Defendant:
Paul Holebook, Rebecca Unknown, Evex Olldham and others
Plaintiff:
Timmathy Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Millay v. Daviess County Detention Center
as 4:2024cv00062
Defendant:
C/O Webb, C/O Dominik Rates, Nurse Patty and others
Plaintiff:
Yehoshua Israel Millay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Potter v. McKenzie et al
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
James Carr Potter, II
Defendant:
Warden Shawn McKenzie and Commissioner Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beraut v. Mazza et al
as 5:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Genesson Beraut
Defendant:
Brian Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bixler v. Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv00062
Defendant:
David Green and Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Kagan Cole Bixler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newland v. Uhl et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Defendant:
Covington Police Department and Adam Uhl
Plaintiff:
Keith Newland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
