Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 5,293
Pickens v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02219
Plaintiff: James W. Pickens
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Carpenter et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02208
Plaintiff: Florence Carpenter , Terry L. Carpenter
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Ortiz v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02215
Plaintiff: Nelson Ortiz
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Patterson v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02217
Plaintiff: Everett T. Patterson
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Pittner v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02216
Plaintiff: Andrew G Pittner, Jr.
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Owens v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02214
Plaintiff: Lisa Nicole Owens
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
DeLong et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02209
Plaintiff: Gloria DeLong , George A. DeLong
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Hawk v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02211
Plaintiff: Mary A. Hawk
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Dailey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02210
Plaintiff: Rodney Gene Dailey
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Little v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02213
Plaintiff: Brandi Kay Little
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.