Southern District of Ohio Cases

Cases filed


Cases 41 - 50 of 39,134
Delaffuente v. Warden Madison Correctional Institution
as 1:2017cv00182
Petitioner: Luis Delaffuente
Respondent: Warden Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hively v. Warden Marion Correctional Institution
as 2:2017cv00222
Petitioner: Bruce A. Hively
Respondent: Warden Marion Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rouse v. National Neighborhood Watch Association
as 1:2017cv00181
Plaintiff: Xezakia Rouse
Defendant: National Neighborhood Watch Association
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Sparks v. Hooper et al
as 2:2017cv00224
Plaintiff: William Sparks
Defendant: Hooper, Baliff 1, Baliff 2 and others
Cause Of Action: Violation of Civil Rights
v. Boyd et al
as 1:2017oe00178
Defendant: Raymond Boyd, GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
Boyd v. GC Services Limited Partnership
as 1:2017cv00179
Plaintiff: Raymond Boyd
Defendant: GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Royalty Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00220
Defendant: Royalty Enterprises, Inc., Clayton King, Christine King and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
Cline et al v. Edwards et al
as 2:2017cv00221
Plaintiff: Marybelle Cline, James Cline
Defendant: Robert H Edwards, Robert H. Edwards, M.D., LLC, United States of America
Cause Of Action: Personal Injury
Standard Textile Co., Inc. v. Medline Industries, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00180
Plaintiff: Standard Textile Co., Inc.
Defendant: Medline Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Trademark Infringement
v. Boyd et al
as 1:2017cv00178
Defendant: Raymond Boyd, GC Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?