District Court Cases in Ohio
Cases 141 - 150 of 165,566
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wion v. Commissioner of SSA
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Karley Ann Wion
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Freeman Jr v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01914
Plaintiff:
Leonard Freeman Jr
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Akens v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01932
Plaintiff:
Dean Akens
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Cook v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65321
Plaintiff:
Angel E Cook
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Vien v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01910
Plaintiff:
Ted Vien
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wion v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00125
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Karley Ann Wion
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Northstar Recycling Company, Inc. v. JT Enviro, LLC
as 2:2024cv01936
Plaintiff:
Northstar Recycling Company, Inc.
Defendant:
JT Enviro, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
