US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Cases 121 - 130 of 26,476
Thomas v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02829
Petitioner:
Joshua Derek Thomas
Defendant:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Beeler v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02834
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Petitioner:
Matthew Beeler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carr v. McCallister et al
as 2:2024cv02831
Defendant:
Sharon McClendon, SCSO Deputy Staff and Janae McCallister
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Lawler et al
as 2:2024cv02832
Defendant:
Marry Lawler, Sharon McCleandon and Janae McCallister
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emery v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2024cv02835
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv02833
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Clay
Defendant:
Lt Jones, Officer Banks, Captain Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Sykes et al
as 2:2024cv02825
Defendant:
Officer White, Hancock, Officer Banks and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Kirk Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Muhammad et al
as 2:2024cv02826
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center Chaplains Department & Personells and Doctor Muhammad
Plaintiff:
Richard Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Kirk et al
as 2:2024cv02827
Defendant:
Captain Kato, Drt Johnson, Officer Banks and others
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv02823
Defendant:
Sergeant Buford, Shelby County Jail, Sergeant Matthews and others
Plaintiff:
Rothello Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
