Tennessee Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed
Cases 141 - 150 of 17,521
RSS Feed | View as table
Doe #044 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff: John Doe #044
Defendant: William - Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02160
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe #043 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff: John Doe #043
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
John Doe #045 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff: John Doe #045
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Doe #042 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff: John Doe #042
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Marable v Ascension St. Thomas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00284
Plaintiff: Carl G. Marable
Defendant: Ascension St. Thomas of Rutherford, Murfreesboro Police Department, Rutherford County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wooden v. Lee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01052
Plaintiff: John H. Wooden and Jabari I. Mandela
Defendant: William Lee, David Raush, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00277
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?