Tennessee Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 354
Taylor v. DHL Supply Chain, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Tania Taylor
Defendant:
DHL Supply Chain, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Parsons v. Graham Lumber Company, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
Chris Parsons
Defendant:
Graham Lumber Company, LLC and American Hardwood Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Ferriss v. HomeServe USA Corp.
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Kristie Ferriss
Defendant:
HomeServe USA Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Tyler v. HomeServ USA Corp.
as 1:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tyler
Defendant:
HomeServ USA Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Crabtree v. Hatch Stamping Company LLC
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Rodney Crabtree
Defendant:
Hatch Stamping Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Hudson v. Caregiver, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
Brandy Hudson
Defendant:
Caregiver, Inc. doing business as Daybreak Community Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Bridge v. CommonSpirit Health
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Connie Tuggle Bridge
Defendant:
CommonSpirit Health doing business as CHI Memorial
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Futch v. Freedom Preparatory Academy, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02798
Plaintiff:
Antonio Futch
Defendant:
Freedom Preparatory Academy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Flack v. Baylor School
as 1:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Dan Flack
Defendant:
Baylor School
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Clark v. Restaurant Growth Services, LLC
as 3:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Jan Clark
Defendant:
Restaurant Growth Services, LLC doing business as OCharleys
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
