U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Eddie Richardson v. Karim Kharbouch
as 24-1119
Plaintiff:
EDDIE L. RICHARDSON, also known as HOTWIRE THE PRODUCER
Defendant:
KARIM KHARBOUCH, also known as FRENCH MONTANA
Christian Mata v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 23-3280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTIAN MATA
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
DaQuan Robinson v. Nayvadius Wilburn, LLC, et al
as 23-2708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAQUAN ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
NAYVADIUS WILBURN, LLC, XAVIER L. DOTSON, also known as ZAYTOVEN, WILBURN HOLDING COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
UIRC-GSA Holdings, LLC v. William Blair & Company, L.L.C., et al
as 23-2566
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UIRC-GSA HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY, L.L.C. and MICHAEL KALT
Ifedoo Enigwe v. Amazon.com Services LLC, et al
as 23-2431
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IFEDOO ENIGWE
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, also known as AMAZON.COM INC and AUTHOR SOLUTIONS, LLC OF DELAWARE, also known as AUTHORHOUSE
UIRC-GSA Holdings, LLC v. William Blair & Company, L.L.C., et al
as 23-1527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UIRC-GSA HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY, L.L.C. and MICHAEL KALT
Vivek Shah v. NYP Holdings, Incorporated, et al
as 23-1127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIVEK SHAH
Defendant / Appellee:
NYP HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED, NEW YORK DAILY NEWS COMPANY, VOX MEDIA, LLC and others
Interfocus Inc. v. Hibobi Technology Limited, et al
as 22-3176
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERFOCUS INC., a California Corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
HIBOBI TECHNOLOGY LIMITED and HANGZHOU HIBABY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Warith Muhammad, I v. Paul Rivera, et al
as 22-2699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARITH R. MUHAMMAD, I
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL RIVERA, LEBRON JAMES and SPRINGHILL COMPANY
Amy Sullivan v. Flora, Inc.
as 22-2386
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMY LEE SULLIVAN, doing business as DESIGN KIT
Defendant / Appellant:
FLORA, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
