U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Cases

Cases filed

Cases 21 - 30 of 24,705
USA v. Rakesh Wahi
as 15-2094
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RAKESH WAHI
USA v. Robert McManus
as 15-2096
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ROBERT MCMANUS
Franklin Elmore v. James Morton, et al
as 15-2097
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANKLIN ELMORE
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES MORTON, Security Therapy Aid, CANDY ANDERSON, Security Therapy Aid
Theopolis Williams v. Rick Harrington, et al
as 15-2100
Plaintiff - Appellant: THEOPOLIS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee: RICK HARRINGTON, GAIL WALLS, RN, Director of Nurses, Menard Correctional Center, KIMBERLY BUTLER, Warden of Programs, Menard Correctional Center and others
Michael O'Donnell v. FBI
as 15-2081
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL P. O'DONNELL
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Lora Wheatley v. Factory Card and Party Outlet
as 15-2083
Plaintiff - Appellant: LORA J. WHEATLEY
Defendant - Appellee: FACTORY CARD AND PARTY OUTLET, a division of Amscan Holdings, Inc.
Tia Robinson v. eCast Settlement Corporation, et al
as 15-2082
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIA ROBINSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: ECAST SETTLEMENT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, BECKET & LEE, LLP, a Pennsylvania Limited Liability Partnership
Thomas Farrugia v. Charles Daniels
as 15-2089
Petitioner - Appellant: THOMAS FARRUGIA
Respondent - Appellee: CHARLES A. DANIELS, Warden
Dale Maisano v. National Commission on Correct, et al
as 15-2084
Plaintiff - Appellant: DALE MAISANO
Defendant - Appellee: NATIONAL COMMISSION ON CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, ZURAN VUHCEVIC, CHRIS JOHNSON and others
Kenneth Price v. USA
as 15-2085
Petitioner - Appellant: KENNETH JAMES PRICE
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.