Seventh Circuit Real Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 935
Condos on the Boulevard v. Burley
as 1:2023cv14239
Defendant:
Anthony Burley and Burtley
Plaintiff:
Condos on the Boulevard
Madden v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 1:2023cv14163
Plaintiff:
Maura Madden
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
PBR Group LLC v. Soo Line Railroad Company
as 4:2023cv04153
Plaintiff:
PBR Group LLC
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Injunctive/Declarato
BODDIE v. Revlon Inc et al
as 1:2023cv12963
Plaintiff:
DEBRA BODDIE
Defendant:
Revlon Inc, LOreal USA Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robert Barker v. Edward Boettcher, et al
as 23-2711
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT W. BARKER
Defendant / Appellant:
EDWARD BOETTCHER and BEVERLY BOETTCHER
CTP Funding LLC v. City of Chicago
as 1:2023cv04381
Plaintiff:
CTP Funding LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Sellars v. EXP Realty LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04389
Plaintiff:
Antoinette C Sellars
Defendant:
EXP Realty LLC, Summit Funding, Prestige Partners Realty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
WOODEN v. CIM TRUST et al
as 1:2023cv01200
Plaintiff:
LARRY WOODEN
Defendant:
CIM TRUST, WATSON FARM H.O.A. and DENNIS FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Clott, Marvin et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Marvin L. Clott, Darryle Clott, Richard K. Thomas and others
Defendant:
United States of America and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410 Quiet Title
United States of America v. Town Of Lac Du Flambeau
as 3:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Town Of Lac Du Flambeau
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
