Seventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 100,851
THOMAS v. JOHN et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
JOHN, NIKKI and LINDSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAJORS v. D.I.I et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MAJORS
Defendant:
D.I.I, VOIGHTSCHILD, PURTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodland v. Meisner
as 2:2024cv00482
Petitioner:
Corey Woodland
Respondent:
Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Gloudemans et al
as 2:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
William Brown
Defendant:
Captain Gloudemans, B Eversor, Mr Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knutson v. Brown County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Knutson
Defendant:
Brown County Sheriffs Department and Vital Core
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00699
Petitioner:
JOHN HARRIS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STOVALL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. STOVALL
Defendant:
VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Jermichael Carroll
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, Jared Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Briggs et al
as 2:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Eric Darcell Walker, Jr
Defendant:
Director Briggs, Warden Jason Benzel, CO B Kapolnek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
