US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Social Security Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,386
Sessoms v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01026
Plaintiff:
Monica Sessoms
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Satala v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00974
Plaintiff:
Adam C. Satala
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mcgee v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Larry Mcgee, Sr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wirtz v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50037
Plaintiff:
Maureen Wirtz
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Richie v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50039
Plaintiff:
Cynthia B. Richie
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Willis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv50029
Plaintiff:
Patricia M. Willis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vrankovich v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
David Vrankovich
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J O'Malley and Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mathews v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Sharyl L Mathews
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Young v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Natalie R Young
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vienup v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Heidi Vienup
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J O'Malley and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
