US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 23,708
Bernard v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2024cv50097
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant:
Monica Carpenter, Susan Tuell, Dr. Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50095
Petitioner:
Derek Joseph Parker
Respondent:
Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Thomas v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02031
Plaintiff:
Derieon Thomas
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Velazquez, J. Frausto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Dart
as 1:2024cv02000
Plaintiff:
Jerome Simpson
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buari v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Yasmin Buari
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv02029
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
John Doe, Tom Dart and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Slater et al
as 1:2024cv01968
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Santez Johnson
Defendant:
R. Slater and Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv02025
Plaintiff:
Jermaine M Phelps
Defendant:
Smith, Mount Sterling Correctional Facility and ERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brodeur v. USA Government et al
as 1:2024cv02062
Petitioner:
Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Respondent:
USA Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Phillips v. Navarro et al
as 1:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Dezzan Denzell Phillips
Defendant:
Joseph R Navarro, Nicholas Navarroli, Cynitha M Raccuglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
