US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 456
KRISTOPEIT v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02804
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
WALTER R. KRISTOPEIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rs
RAY v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv04999
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
CHAD RAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
BROUGH v. SAUL
as 4:2019cv00150
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
BRIAN D BROUGH and BRIAN D. BROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
DICKERSON v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv04055
Plaintiff:
JB DICKERSON, JR.
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PACK v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv04029
Plaintiff:
CLARA Z. PACK
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GORDON v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv04640
Defendant:
NANCY BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
CAROLINE GORDON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only), SSA-USAO (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 rs Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
SCHUAUNAMAN v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv02521
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
TANYA SCHUAUNAMAN
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GOCHANOUR v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00299
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
TIDY LOU GOCHANOUR
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BAUGH v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01847
Plaintiff:
LINDA D. BAUGH
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HANSON v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv01507
Defendant:
NANCY BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
ERIK W. HANSON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
