US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 81
ARAC ROOF IT FORWARD v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2017cv04468
Plaintiff:
ARAC ROOF IT FORWARD
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
CENTO v. PORTFOLIO MEDIA COMPANY
as 1:2017cv03777
Plaintiff:
GUERINO CENTO
Defendant:
PORTFOLIO MEDIA COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
HARLSON v. MCKALLIP
as 1:2017cv01852
Plaintiff:
KENDALL LEE HARLSON
Defendant:
BRANDON KENNEDY MCKALLIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MARTIN v. FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 3:2017cv00075
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY SHERIFF, FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA, INDIANA STATE POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DOUGLAS MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
MATAVULI et al v. DERKSEN et al
as 4:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY ANN BENGTSON and MARCO MATAVULI
Defendant:
ABRAHAM DERKSEN and JACOB DERKSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
KONRATH v. VANCE et al
as 1:2016cv02784
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS MONTHLY and ALLISON VANCE
Plaintiff:
GREGORY KONRATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
KONRATH v. VANCE
as 1:2016cv02794
Plaintiff:
GREGORY KONRATH
Defendant:
ALLISON COPENBARGER VANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
KONRATH v. VANCE
as 1:2016cv02795
Plaintiff:
GREGORY KONRATH
Defendant:
ALLISON VANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
WELLS v. BLUE SKY CASINO, LLC, et al
as 4:2016cv00037
Defendant:
BLUE SKY CASINO, LLC and BRIAN MARSH
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY A. WELLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
MIMMS ET AL. v. CVS PHARMACY, INC.
as 1:2015cv00970
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MIMMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
