District of Indiana Torts - Injury Cases

Airplane Product Liability Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 8 of 8
KNOP et al v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2009cv01465
Cause Of Action: Diversity
UNIVERSAL HELICOPTERS NEWFOUNDLAND LIMITED v. ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2009cv00856
Plaintiff: UNIVERSAL HELICOPTERS NEWFOUNDLAND LIMITED, UNIVERSAL HELICOPTERS NEWFOUNDLAND LIMITED
Defendant: ROLLS-ROYCE CORPORATION, ROLLS-ROYCE NORTH AMERICA, INC., HOWMET CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
ADAMS v. CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION et al
as 1:2008cv01623
Plaintiff: JANET P. ADAMS, JANET P. ADAMS
Defendant: CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION, CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION, BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
EDESESS v. CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION et al
as 1:2008cv01064
Plaintiff: ROBERT B. EDESESS, JR., ROBERT B. EDESESS, JR.
Defendant: CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION, BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC., TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
EDESESS v. CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION et al
as 1:2008cv00866
Plaintiff: JEREMY EDESESS, JEREMY EDESESS
Defendant: CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION, BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC., AVIDYNE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
EDESESS v. CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION et al
as 1:2008cv00865
Plaintiff: POOLSIRI EDESESS, POOLSIRI EDESESS
Defendant: CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION, BALLISTIC RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC., AVIDYNE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GORE v. MILLER
as 1:2008cv00499
Plaintiff: CRAIG GORE
Defendant: ROBIN MILLER
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Federal Insurance Company v. Corporate Jets Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00173
Plaintiff: Federal Insurance Company
Defendant: Corporate Jets Inc, C J Systems Aviation Group Inc, Edward D Ban and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.