Indiana Labor Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 311
HENSLEY et al v. DOLGENCORP, INC.
as 1:2014cv00435
Defendant:
DOLGENCORP, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HENSLEY and TAMMY HENSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
STOVER v. ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, LLC
as 1:2014cv00407
Defendant:
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, LLC
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
BATES v. AMERIPATH KENTUCKY, INC.
as 1:2014cv00344
Defendant:
AMERIPATH KENTUCKY, INC.
Plaintiff:
NIKITA BATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
JOHNSON v. NICE-PAK PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2014cv00343
Plaintiff:
DARIN B. JOHNSON
Defendant:
NICE-PAK PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BOOHER v. CERES SOLUTIONS LLP
as 1:2013cv01902
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL BOOHER
Defendant:
CERES SOLUTIONS LLP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
McLaurin et al v. Gary City of
as 3:2013cv01132
Plaintiff:
Juana D McLaurin , Sonji Draper , Charlotte Thompson and others
Defendant:
Gary City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DORSEY v. SHIRE REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC.
as 1:2013cv01583
Plaintiff:
JON DORSEY
Defendant:
SHIRE REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
GAMMON v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 3:2013cv00183
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Plaintiff:
GERALD L. GAMMON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. COMMERCIAL AIR, INC.
as 1:2013cv01438
Defendant:
COMMERCIAL AIR, INC.
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
McCarty v. Purdue University Board of Trustees et al
as 4:2013cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eric McCarty
Defendant:
Purdue University Board of Trustees , Purdue University , Gregory W Hedrick, II and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
