Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,603
Davis v. Boughton
as 2:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Demoyne Davis
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singh v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv00170
Petitioner:
Arshpreet Singh
Respondent:
Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Okafor, Chidiebele v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Chidiebele Okafor
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harris v. Jewell
as 2:2024cv00141
Petitioner:
Steven Lamar Harris
Respondent:
Chantell Jewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Christiansen, Robert v. Rosenberg, G.
as 3:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Robert Christiansen
Respondent:
Warden G. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McKinney v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
Terry Lee McKinney
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vega v. Stevens
as 2:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Alfredo Vega
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeBrow, Eric v. Hepp, Randall et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Eric James DeBrow
Respondent:
Randall Hepp and WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eggum v. Severson
as 2:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Keith Eggum
Respondent:
Eric J Severson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson, Maurice v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Maurice M Johnson, Jr. and Maurice M. Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.