Eighth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 68,398
Anthony Hall, Jr. v. United States
as 25-2199
Petitioner:
Anthony Steven Hall, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
as 4:2025cv00591
Plaintiff:
Justice Hill
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Faulkenberry et al v. Arkansas Department of Education et al
as 4:2025cv00592
Plaintiff:
Gwen Faulkenberry, Special Renee Sanders, Kimberly Crutchfield and others
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Education, Jacob Oliva, Sarah Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
United States of America v. Ladapo
as 0:2025cv02473
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Olajide Ladapo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Gomez v. Southeast Hospital d/b/a Mercy Hospital
as 1:2025cv00108
Plaintiff:
Yanira Areli Gomez
Defendant:
Southeast Hospital d/b/a Mercy Hospital
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
L.C. v. Shree Ganesh of Springfield, LLC d/b/a Dogwood Park Inn et al
as 6:2025cv03157
Plaintiff:
L.C.
Defendant:
Shree Ganesh of Springfield, LLC d/b/a Dogwood Park Inn and Shri Sai, LLC d/b/a Economy Inn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Select Rehabilitation, LLC v. Shady Lawn Living Center, Inc.
as 5:2025cv06109
Petitioner:
Select Rehabilitation, LLC
Respondent:
Shady Lawn Living Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
United States v. Leslie Apple
as 25-2181
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Leslie Apple
United States v. D.R.
as 25-2182
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
D.R., also known as D.M.
United States v. Margo Williams
as 25-2183
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Margo Ann Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
