Eighth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21,918
Banks v. Carnahan et al
as 4:2025cv00447
Plaintiff:
Montrel Banks
Defendant:
Chris Carnahan and Circuit Court of Faulkner County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards, Jr. v. Does 1-4 et al
as 5:2025cv05096
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edwards, Jr.
Defendant:
John Does 1-4, Jane Does 1-2, Public Defender Denny Hyslip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cratton v. Webber et al
as 4:2025cv00165
Plaintiff:
Ricky Deshun Cratton
Defendant:
Stacy Webber, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Missouri v. Gray-El
as 1:2025cv00076
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri
Defendant:
Monika Gray-El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455 Procedure for Removal Criminal Prosecutions
Evans v. Rice et al
as 4:2025cv00652
Plaintiff:
Bryant Evans
Defendant:
Unknown Rice, Unknown Thompson, Heaven Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Missouri
as 4:2025cv00656
Plaintiff:
Monte Dean Marsh Williams
Defendant:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Tyson, Sr. v. Julie Govern, et al
as 25-1922
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
Julie Govern, Josh Baal, Jason Hute and others
Billy Frazier v. Judge Casey Jones, et al
as 25-1923
Plaintiff:
Billy Frazier
Defendant:
Judge Casey Jones, Judge Nicholas L. Scott, Judge Russell Keast and others
McCoy v. Morris et al
as 4:2025cv00441
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Jimmy C Morris, Robert Dittrich, Alex Guynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Edwards et al
as 4:2025cv00444
Plaintiff:
Arick Johnson
Defendant:
Robert Edwards, Leon Johnson and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
