Eighth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 73,528
Hayes v. Black Hawk County Jail et al
as 6:2024cv02019
Plaintiff:
Eric Darnail Hayes, Jr
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Jail, Tony Tomson and Nathan Neff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dinkins v. USA
as 4:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
Robert O. Dinkins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ford v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Justin D Ford
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodriguez v. Sherburne County Jail
as 0:2024cv01367
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Rodriguez
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Justin Ardis Easley
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Hannibal Police Department, Matthew Wilt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fletcher v. Karas Correctional Health (KCH) et al
as 5:2024cv05088
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Fletcher
Defendant:
Karas Correctional Health (KCH), Sheriff Jay Cantrell, Dustin Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00550
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gallop v. Segal
as 0:2024cv01357
Petitioner:
Teresa Gallop
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter et al v. Fredrickson et al
as 4:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Ronald Carter and Shirley Carter
Defendant:
Aaron Fredrickson, Terry Helmick and Shelby County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
