US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16,715
Brown v. Parsons et al
as 4:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Tiequail Brown
Defendant:
Parsons, Echels, Wade Gilliam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Tevin Randle
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Ladner et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Rickey Brown
Defendant:
Cody Ladner, Taylor Igleheart and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift v. Dunagan et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J Swift
Defendant:
Heath Dunagan, Clint Baker, John C Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Greene County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Branden D Sims
Defendant:
Greene County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Ashley King, Shrika Green, Mary Mena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Elias et al
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Foster, Jr
Defendant:
Mattrew Elias, Joseph Mahoney, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Cooksie et al
as 4:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Lanika Cooksie, Shelby Huston, John Brazzeale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lackie v. Dennis et al
as 4:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Richard Daniel Lackie
Defendant:
Dennis, John Putman and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Hess et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jerod Watts
Defendant:
Jessica Hess, Shane Russell, Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
