US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 16,708
Michalek v. Rockport, City of et al
as 4:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Brian Judah Beischl Michalek
Defendant:
Rockport and Malvern Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. White Castle et al
as 4:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
White Castle, Bank of America, Sparks Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barefield v. Conway et al
as 4:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Keya Deonte Barefield
Defendant:
Cynthia Conway, Joseph Mahoney, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liscomb v. Randel et al
as 4:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Liscomb
Defendant:
Kenyen Randel, Antonio D Johnson, Jr, Tod Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. USA
as 4:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Brandon Charles Martin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Titus v. Mortal Kombat et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Mortal Kombat, Mortal Kombat III Finish Him, Ogaras Imported Cars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Barr v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Lord Judah Al-Barr
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hill v. WellPath Medical Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
WellPath Medical Corporation, Kent, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toth v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allen Toth
Defendant:
Joe Payne and Bolden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Robinson et al
as 4:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Jane Robinson, Lindsy Hill, Francis Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
